# Bulenox vs Funding Pips

> Bulenox and Funding Pips compared on cost, risk rules, payouts and platforms. Bulenox uses trailing maximum drawdown and Funding Pips uses static. Across 4 directly comparable measures, Bulenox leads on 0 and Funding Pips on 4.

**Source:** https://propfirmpal.com/compare/bulenox-vs-funding-pips  
**Generated:** 2026-09-25  
**Publisher:** Prop Firm Pal — independent prop firm comparison

_Prop Firm Pal earns affiliate commission from some listed firms. This is disclosed on-site and does not affect the computed ranking order._

---

## Side by side

| Measure | Bulenox | Funding Pips |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account | Not published | $422 |
| Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded | Not published | $2.36 |
| Cheapest evaluation entry price | Not published | $29 |
| Instant funding to $100,000 | $648 | $444 |
| Evaluation types offered | instant | 2-step, 1-step, instant |
| Maximum advertised profit split | Not published | 95% |
| Phase 1 profit target | Not published | 5% |
| Account sizes sold | $25,000, $50,000, $100,000, $150,000 | $5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more |
| Daily drawdown limit | Not published | 3% |
| Maximum drawdown limit | 4% | 5% |
| Maximum drawdown style | Trailing | Static |
| Drawdown measured on | Not published | Equity |
| Payout frequency | Daily on Fast Track and Momentum accounts, with no minimum number of trading days before the first request | Bi-weekly |
| Payout methods | Not published | Bank Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Cryptom +1 more |
| Payment methods accepted | Credit card, Debit card, PayPal, Crypto | Credit Card, Debit Card, Crypto, Bank Transfer +5 more |
| Trading platforms | Rithmic, NinjaTrader | MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader |
| Instruments | CME futures, CBOT futures, NYMEX futures, COMEX futures | Forex, Metals, Energy, Crypto +1 more |
| Maximum forex leverage | Not published | 1:100 |
| Community rating | No reviews yet | 4.0/5 (61) |
| Founded | Not published | 2022 |
| Company location | United States | United Arab Emirates |
| Prop Firm Pal verification | Sourced, not verified | Verified |

## Frequently asked questions

### What is the difference in drawdown rules between Bulenox and Funding Pips?

Daily drawdown is Not published at Bulenox and 3% at Funding Pips. Maximum drawdown is 4% and 5% respectively. Bulenox uses a trailing maximum drawdown while Funding Pips uses a static one — a trailing limit follows your peak balance and is materially harder to trade around than a static one fixed to your starting balance.

### What platforms do Bulenox and Funding Pips support?

Bulenox supports Rithmic, NinjaTrader. Funding Pips supports MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader.

### Which is rated higher by traders, Bulenox or Funding Pips?

Bulenox scores no reviews yet and Funding Pips scores 4.0/5 from 61 reviews on Prop Firm Pal. Review scores are trader-submitted and are independent of any commercial relationship.

### Should I choose Bulenox or Funding Pips?

On the 4 directly comparable measures on this page, Bulenox leads on 0 and Funding Pips on 4. Which of those measures matters depends on how you trade: cost matters most if you expect to need several attempts, drawdown style matters most if you hold positions overnight, and payout terms matter most once you are funded. Prop Firm Pal does not recommend one firm over another, and earns affiliate commission from some listed firms.

## Related pages

- [Bulenox](https://propfirmpal.com/firms/unverified/bulenox)
- [Funding Pips](https://propfirmpal.com/firms/verified/funding-pips)
- [Every prop firm comparison](https://propfirmpal.com/compare)