# Funding Pips vs IC Funded

> Funding Pips and IC Funded compared on cost, risk rules, payouts and platforms. Funding Pips advertises the higher profit split at 95% against 80%. Across 8 directly comparable measures, Funding Pips leads on 5 and IC Funded on 0.

**Source:** https://propfirmpal.com/compare/funding-pips-vs-ic-funded  
**Generated:** 2026-09-25  
**Publisher:** Prop Firm Pal — independent prop firm comparison

_Prop Firm Pal earns affiliate commission from some listed firms. This is disclosed on-site and does not affect the computed ranking order._

---

## Side by side

| Measure | Funding Pips | IC Funded |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account | $422 | Not published |
| Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded | $2.36 | $14.80 |
| Cheapest evaluation entry price | $29 | $74 |
| Instant funding to $100,000 | $444 | Not offered |
| Evaluation types offered | 2-step, 1-step, instant | 2-step, 1-step, instant |
| Maximum advertised profit split | 95% | 80% |
| Phase 1 profit target | 5% | 10% |
| Account sizes sold | $5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more | $5,000 |
| Daily drawdown limit | 3% | 3% |
| Maximum drawdown limit | 5% | 5% |
| Maximum drawdown style | Static | Static |
| Drawdown measured on | Equity | Not published |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly | Bi-weekly, on 14-day cycles |
| Payout methods | Bank Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Cryptom +1 more | Not published |
| Payment methods accepted | Credit Card, Debit Card, Crypto, Bank Transfer +5 more | Not published |
| Trading platforms | MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader | MT5, cTrader |
| Instruments | Forex, Metals, Energy, Crypto +1 more | Not published |
| Maximum forex leverage | 1:100 | Not published |
| Community rating | 4.0/5 (61) | No reviews yet |
| Founded | 2022 | Not published |
| Company location | United Arab Emirates | Not published |
| Prop Firm Pal verification | Verified | Sourced, not verified |

## Frequently asked questions

### Which has the better profit split, Funding Pips or IC Funded?

Funding Pips advertises the higher maximum at 95%, against 80% at IC Funded. Note that the advertised maximum usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than applying to a first account.

### What is the difference in drawdown rules between Funding Pips and IC Funded?

Daily drawdown is 3% at Funding Pips and 3% at IC Funded. Maximum drawdown is 5% and 5% respectively. Both use a static maximum drawdown.

### What platforms do Funding Pips and IC Funded support?

Funding Pips supports MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader. IC Funded supports MT5, cTrader.

### Which is rated higher by traders, Funding Pips or IC Funded?

Funding Pips scores 4.0/5 from 61 reviews and IC Funded scores no reviews yet on Prop Firm Pal. Review scores are trader-submitted and are independent of any commercial relationship.

### Should I choose Funding Pips or IC Funded?

On the 8 directly comparable measures on this page, Funding Pips leads on 5 and IC Funded on 0, with 3 tied. Which of those measures matters depends on how you trade: cost matters most if you expect to need several attempts, drawdown style matters most if you hold positions overnight, and payout terms matter most once you are funded. Prop Firm Pal does not recommend one firm over another, and earns affiliate commission from some listed firms.

## Related pages

- [Funding Pips](https://propfirmpal.com/firms/verified/funding-pips)
- [IC Funded](https://propfirmpal.com/firms/unverified/ic-funded)
- [Every prop firm comparison](https://propfirmpal.com/compare)