Blue Guardian vs Funding Pips
Every figure below is computed from the same normalised dataset, so the two firms are measured on identical terms.
Blue Guardian vs Funding Pips — the short answer
Blue Guardian is the cheaper route to a $100,000 funded account at $371 against $422 for Funding Pips — a difference of $51. Funding Pips advertises the higher profit split at 95% against 90%. Blue Guardian uses trailing maximum drawdown and Funding Pips uses static. Across 13 directly comparable measures, Blue Guardian leads on 6 and Funding Pips on 4.
Where Blue Guardian wins
- Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account: $371
- Cheapest evaluation entry price: $24
- Phase 1 profit target: 4%
- Maximum drawdown limit: 6%
- Community rating: 4.0/5 (12)
- Founded: 2019
Where Funding Pips wins
- Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded: $2.36
- Instant funding to $100,000: $444
- Maximum advertised profit split: 95%
- Maximum drawdown style: Static
4.05
(12 reviews)
4
(61 reviews)
Cost
Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account
The fairest like-for-like price: entry prices are not comparable when the smallest account differs.
$371
$422
Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded
$3.36
$2.36
Cheapest evaluation entry price
The smallest account each firm sells — useful for a first attempt, not for comparing value.
$24
$29
Instant funding to $100,000
Priced on a different basis to an evaluation — there is no challenge to pass.
$623
$444
Programme
Evaluation types offered
instant, 1-step, 2-step
2-step, 1-step, instant
Maximum advertised profit split
Usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than being the default.
90%
95%
Phase 1 profit target
4%
5%
Account sizes sold
$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +3 more
$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more
Risk rules
Daily drawdown limit
A larger limit is more room to trade, not a better product.
3%
3%
Maximum drawdown limit
6%
5%
Maximum drawdown style
Static is fixed from your starting balance. Trailing follows your peak and is harder to trade.
Trailing
Static
Drawdown measured on
Equity counts open positions in real time. Balance counts only closed trades.
Equity
Equity
Payouts
Payout frequency
Instant Payouts
Bi-weekly
Payout methods
Riseworks, Crypto
Bank Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Cryptom +1 more
Payment methods accepted
Debit Card, Credit Card, Crypto, Apple Pay +1 more
Credit Card, Debit Card, Crypto, Bank Transfer +5 more
Platforms & markets
Trading platforms
MT5, Trade Locker, MatchTrader
MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader
Instruments
Forex, Indicies, Metals, Cryptos +1 more
Forex, Metals, Energy, Crypto +1 more
Maximum forex leverage
More leverage is more flexibility and more risk — neither firm is better here by default.
1:50
1:100
Track record
Community rating
4.0/5 (12)
4.0/5 (61)
Founded
Longer in market is more track record, all else equal.
2019
2022
Company location
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
Prop Firm Pal verification
Verified
Verified
A highlighted cell means that value is more favourable to the trader on a measure with a defensible direction — cheaper, more drawdown room, a lower target. Rows where the better choice depends on how you trade, such as leverage or platform support, are shown without a highlight. Prop Firm Pal earns affiliate commission from some listed firms; this never affects the figures above.
Frequently asked questions
Blue Guardian and Funding Pips, answered from the data above
Is Blue Guardian or Funding Pips cheaper?
Blue Guardian is cheaper for an evaluation to a $100,000 funded account at $371, against $422 for Funding Pips. Entry prices differ too — Blue Guardian starts at $24 and Funding Pips at $29 — but those are for different account sizes, so they are not a like-for-like comparison.
Which has the better profit split, Blue Guardian or Funding Pips?
Funding Pips advertises the higher maximum at 95%, against 90% at Blue Guardian. Note that the advertised maximum usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than applying to a first account.
What is the difference in drawdown rules between Blue Guardian and Funding Pips?
Daily drawdown is 3% at Blue Guardian and 3% at Funding Pips. Maximum drawdown is 6% and 5% respectively. Blue Guardian uses a trailing maximum drawdown while Funding Pips uses a static one — a trailing limit follows your peak balance and is materially harder to trade around than a static one fixed to your starting balance.
What platforms do Blue Guardian and Funding Pips support?
Blue Guardian supports MT5, Trade Locker, MatchTrader. Funding Pips supports MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader.
Which is rated higher by traders, Blue Guardian or Funding Pips?
Blue Guardian scores 4.0/5 from 12 reviews and Funding Pips scores 4.0/5 from 61 reviews on Prop Firm Pal. Review scores are trader-submitted and are independent of any commercial relationship.
Should I choose Blue Guardian or Funding Pips?
On the 13 directly comparable measures on this page, Blue Guardian leads on 6 and Funding Pips on 4, with 3 tied. Which of those measures matters depends on how you trade: cost matters most if you expect to need several attempts, drawdown style matters most if you hold positions overnight, and payout terms matter most once you are funded. Prop Firm Pal does not recommend one firm over another, and earns affiliate commission from some listed firms.