Funding Pips vs Lark Funding
Every figure below is computed from the same normalised dataset, so the two firms are measured on identical terms.
Funding Pips vs Lark Funding — the short answer
Lark Funding is the cheaper route to a $100,000 funded account at $370 against $422 for Funding Pips — a difference of $52. Funding Pips advertises the higher profit split at 95% against 90%. Funding Pips uses static maximum drawdown and Lark Funding uses trailing. Across 13 directly comparable measures, Funding Pips leads on 5 and Lark Funding on 4.
Where Funding Pips wins
- Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded: $2.36
- Cheapest evaluation entry price: $29
- Instant funding to $100,000: $444
- Maximum advertised profit split: 95%
- Maximum drawdown style: Static
Where Lark Funding wins
- Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account: $370
- Phase 1 profit target: 3%
- Daily drawdown limit: 5%
- Community rating: 4.5/5 (7)
4
(61 reviews)
4.5
(7 reviews)
Cost
Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account
The fairest like-for-like price: entry prices are not comparable when the smallest account differs.
$422
$370
Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded
$2.36
$3.70
Cheapest evaluation entry price
The smallest account each firm sells — useful for a first attempt, not for comparing value.
$29
$105
Instant funding to $100,000
Priced on a different basis to an evaluation — there is no challenge to pass.
$444
$4,500
Programme
Evaluation types offered
2-step, 1-step, instant
1-step, 3-step, instant
Maximum advertised profit split
Usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than being the default.
95%
90%
Phase 1 profit target
5%
3%
Account sizes sold
$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more
$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more
Risk rules
Daily drawdown limit
A larger limit is more room to trade, not a better product.
3%
5%
Maximum drawdown limit
5%
5%
Maximum drawdown style
Static is fixed from your starting balance. Trailing follows your peak and is harder to trade.
Static
Trailing
Drawdown measured on
Equity counts open positions in real time. Balance counts only closed trades.
Equity
Equity
Payouts
Payout frequency
Bi-weekly
Not published
Payout methods
Bank Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Cryptom +1 more
Bank Transfer, Wise, Crypto, PayPal +1 more
Payment methods accepted
Credit Card, Debit Card, Crypto, Bank Transfer +5 more
Credit Card, Crypto, Wise, Riseworks
Platforms & markets
Trading platforms
MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader
MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade +1 more
Instruments
Forex, Metals, Energy, Crypto +1 more
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto +2 more
Maximum forex leverage
More leverage is more flexibility and more risk — neither firm is better here by default.
1:100
1:50
Track record
Community rating
4.0/5 (61)
4.5/5 (7)
Founded
Longer in market is more track record, all else equal.
2022
2022
Company location
United Arab Emirates
Canada
Prop Firm Pal verification
Verified
Verified
A highlighted cell means that value is more favourable to the trader on a measure with a defensible direction — cheaper, more drawdown room, a lower target. Rows where the better choice depends on how you trade, such as leverage or platform support, are shown without a highlight. Prop Firm Pal earns affiliate commission from some listed firms; this never affects the figures above.
Frequently asked questions
Funding Pips and Lark Funding, answered from the data above
Is Funding Pips or Lark Funding cheaper?
Lark Funding is cheaper for an evaluation to a $100,000 funded account at $370, against $422 for Funding Pips. Entry prices differ too — Funding Pips starts at $29 and Lark Funding at $105 — but those are for different account sizes, so they are not a like-for-like comparison.
Which has the better profit split, Funding Pips or Lark Funding?
Funding Pips advertises the higher maximum at 95%, against 90% at Lark Funding. Note that the advertised maximum usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than applying to a first account.
What is the difference in drawdown rules between Funding Pips and Lark Funding?
Daily drawdown is 3% at Funding Pips and 5% at Lark Funding. Maximum drawdown is 5% and 5% respectively. Funding Pips uses a static maximum drawdown while Lark Funding uses a trailing one — a trailing limit follows your peak balance and is materially harder to trade around than a static one fixed to your starting balance.
What platforms do Funding Pips and Lark Funding support?
Funding Pips supports MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader. Lark Funding supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, TradingView.
Which is rated higher by traders, Funding Pips or Lark Funding?
Funding Pips scores 4.0/5 from 61 reviews and Lark Funding scores 4.5/5 from 7 reviews on Prop Firm Pal. Review scores are trader-submitted and are independent of any commercial relationship.
Should I choose Funding Pips or Lark Funding?
On the 13 directly comparable measures on this page, Funding Pips leads on 5 and Lark Funding on 4, with 4 tied. Which of those measures matters depends on how you trade: cost matters most if you expect to need several attempts, drawdown style matters most if you hold positions overnight, and payout terms matter most once you are funded. Prop Firm Pal does not recommend one firm over another, and earns affiliate commission from some listed firms.