DNA Funded vs Funding Pips

Every figure below is computed from the same normalised dataset, so the two firms are measured on identical terms.

DNA Funded vs Funding Pips — the short answer

Funding Pips is the cheaper route to a $100,000 funded account at $422 against $549 for DNA Funded — a difference of $127. Funding Pips advertises the higher profit split at 95% against 90%. DNA Funded uses trailing maximum drawdown and Funding Pips uses static. Across 11 directly comparable measures, DNA Funded leads on 0 and Funding Pips on 7.

Where DNA Funded wins

Nothing measurable — Funding Pips matches or leads on every comparable figure we hold.

Where Funding Pips wins

  • Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account: $422
  • Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded: $2.36
  • Cheapest evaluation entry price: $29
  • Maximum advertised profit split: 95%
  • Maximum drawdown limit: 5%
  • Maximum drawdown style: Static
  • Founded: 2022
DNA Funded

4

(1 review)

Funding Pips

4

(61 reviews)

Cost

Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account

The fairest like-for-like price: entry prices are not comparable when the smallest account differs.

$549

$422

Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded

$5.39

$2.36

Cheapest evaluation entry price

The smallest account each firm sells — useful for a first attempt, not for comparing value.

$49

$29

Instant funding to $100,000

Priced on a different basis to an evaluation — there is no challenge to pass.

Not offered

$444

Programme

Evaluation types offered

1-step, instant

2-step, 1-step, instant

Maximum advertised profit split

Usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than being the default.

90%

95%

Phase 1 profit target

5%

5%

Account sizes sold

$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more

$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more

Risk rules

Daily drawdown limit

A larger limit is more room to trade, not a better product.

3%

3%

Maximum drawdown limit

4%

5%

Maximum drawdown style

Static is fixed from your starting balance. Trailing follows your peak and is harder to trade.

Trailing

Static

Drawdown measured on

Equity counts open positions in real time. Balance counts only closed trades.

Equity

Equity

Payouts

Payout frequency

Every 14 days

Bi-weekly

Payout methods

Crypto, Bank Transfer

Bank Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Cryptom +1 more

Payment methods accepted

Visa, Mastercard, Crypto

Credit Card, Debit Card, Crypto, Bank Transfer +5 more

Platforms & markets

Trading platforms

Trade Locker

MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader

Instruments

Forex, Metals, Cryptos, Commodities +2 more

Forex, Metals, Energy, Crypto +1 more

Maximum forex leverage

More leverage is more flexibility and more risk — neither firm is better here by default.

1:50

1:100

Track record

Community rating

4.0/5 (1)

4.0/5 (61)

Founded

Longer in market is more track record, all else equal.

2024

2022

Company location

Australia

United Arab Emirates

Prop Firm Pal verification

Verified

Verified

A highlighted cell means that value is more favourable to the trader on a measure with a defensible direction — cheaper, more drawdown room, a lower target. Rows where the better choice depends on how you trade, such as leverage or platform support, are shown without a highlight. Prop Firm Pal earns affiliate commission from some listed firms; this never affects the figures above.

Frequently asked questions

DNA Funded and Funding Pips, answered from the data above

Is DNA Funded or Funding Pips cheaper?

Funding Pips is cheaper for an evaluation to a $100,000 funded account at $422, against $549 for DNA Funded. Entry prices differ too — DNA Funded starts at $49 and Funding Pips at $29 — but those are for different account sizes, so they are not a like-for-like comparison.

Which has the better profit split, DNA Funded or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips advertises the higher maximum at 95%, against 90% at DNA Funded. Note that the advertised maximum usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than applying to a first account.

What is the difference in drawdown rules between DNA Funded and Funding Pips?

Daily drawdown is 3% at DNA Funded and 3% at Funding Pips. Maximum drawdown is 4% and 5% respectively. DNA Funded uses a trailing maximum drawdown while Funding Pips uses a static one — a trailing limit follows your peak balance and is materially harder to trade around than a static one fixed to your starting balance.

What platforms do DNA Funded and Funding Pips support?

DNA Funded supports Trade Locker. Funding Pips supports MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader.

Which is rated higher by traders, DNA Funded or Funding Pips?

DNA Funded scores 4.0/5 from 1 review and Funding Pips scores 4.0/5 from 61 reviews on Prop Firm Pal. Review scores are trader-submitted and are independent of any commercial relationship.

Should I choose DNA Funded or Funding Pips?

On the 11 directly comparable measures on this page, DNA Funded leads on 0 and Funding Pips on 7, with 4 tied. Which of those measures matters depends on how you trade: cost matters most if you expect to need several attempts, drawdown style matters most if you hold positions overnight, and payout terms matter most once you are funded. Prop Firm Pal does not recommend one firm over another, and earns affiliate commission from some listed firms.

Related comparisons