Funding Pips vs Funding Traders
Every figure below is computed from the same normalised dataset, so the two firms are measured on identical terms.
Funding Pips vs Funding Traders — the short answer
Funding Traders is the cheaper route to a $100,000 funded account at $419 against $422 for Funding Pips — a difference of $3. Funding Traders advertises the higher profit split at 100% against 95%. Funding Pips uses static maximum drawdown and Funding Traders uses trailing. Across 12 directly comparable measures, Funding Pips leads on 5 and Funding Traders on 3.
Where Funding Pips wins
- Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded: $2.36
- Cheapest evaluation entry price: $29
- Instant funding to $100,000: $444
- Maximum drawdown style: Static
- Founded: 2022
Where Funding Traders wins
- Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account: $419
- Maximum advertised profit split: 100%
- Maximum drawdown limit: 6%
4
(61 reviews)
0
(0 reviews)
Cost
Evaluation cost to a $100,000 account
The fairest like-for-like price: entry prices are not comparable when the smallest account differs.
$422
$419
Cheapest evaluation cost per $1,000 funded
$2.36
$4.00
Cheapest evaluation entry price
The smallest account each firm sells — useful for a first attempt, not for comparing value.
$29
$39
Instant funding to $100,000
Priced on a different basis to an evaluation — there is no challenge to pass.
$444
$670
Programme
Evaluation types offered
2-step, 1-step, instant
instant, 2-step, 1-step
Maximum advertised profit split
Usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than being the default.
95%
100%
Phase 1 profit target
5%
5%
Account sizes sold
$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +1 more
$5,000, $10,000, $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 +2 more
Risk rules
Daily drawdown limit
A larger limit is more room to trade, not a better product.
3%
3%
Maximum drawdown limit
5%
6%
Maximum drawdown style
Static is fixed from your starting balance. Trailing follows your peak and is harder to trade.
Static
Trailing
Drawdown measured on
Equity counts open positions in real time. Balance counts only closed trades.
Equity
Equity
Payouts
Payout frequency
Bi-weekly
14 Days
Payout methods
Bank Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Cryptom +1 more
Rise, Crypto
Payment methods accepted
Credit Card, Debit Card, Crypto, Bank Transfer +5 more
Credit Card, Debit Card, Crypto
Platforms & markets
Trading platforms
MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader
MT5, Trade Locker
Instruments
Forex, Metals, Energy, Crypto +1 more
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Oil +1 more
Maximum forex leverage
More leverage is more flexibility and more risk — neither firm is better here by default.
1:100
1:50
Track record
Community rating
4.0/5 (61)
No reviews yet
Founded
Longer in market is more track record, all else equal.
2022
2023
Company location
United Arab Emirates
Hong Kong
Prop Firm Pal verification
Verified
Verified
A highlighted cell means that value is more favourable to the trader on a measure with a defensible direction — cheaper, more drawdown room, a lower target. Rows where the better choice depends on how you trade, such as leverage or platform support, are shown without a highlight. Prop Firm Pal earns affiliate commission from some listed firms; this never affects the figures above.
Frequently asked questions
Funding Pips and Funding Traders, answered from the data above
Is Funding Pips or Funding Traders cheaper?
Funding Traders is cheaper for an evaluation to a $100,000 funded account at $419, against $422 for Funding Pips. Entry prices differ too — Funding Pips starts at $29 and Funding Traders at $39 — but those are for different account sizes, so they are not a like-for-like comparison.
Which has the better profit split, Funding Pips or Funding Traders?
Funding Traders advertises the higher maximum at 100%, against 95% at Funding Pips. Note that the advertised maximum usually requires a scaling plan or a paid add-on rather than applying to a first account.
What is the difference in drawdown rules between Funding Pips and Funding Traders?
Daily drawdown is 3% at Funding Pips and 3% at Funding Traders. Maximum drawdown is 5% and 6% respectively. Funding Pips uses a static maximum drawdown while Funding Traders uses a trailing one — a trailing limit follows your peak balance and is materially harder to trade around than a static one fixed to your starting balance.
What platforms do Funding Pips and Funding Traders support?
Funding Pips supports MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader. Funding Traders supports MT5, Trade Locker.
Which is rated higher by traders, Funding Pips or Funding Traders?
Funding Pips scores 4.0/5 from 61 reviews and Funding Traders scores no reviews yet on Prop Firm Pal. Review scores are trader-submitted and are independent of any commercial relationship.
Should I choose Funding Pips or Funding Traders?
On the 12 directly comparable measures on this page, Funding Pips leads on 5 and Funding Traders on 3, with 4 tied. Which of those measures matters depends on how you trade: cost matters most if you expect to need several attempts, drawdown style matters most if you hold positions overnight, and payout terms matter most once you are funded. Prop Firm Pal does not recommend one firm over another, and earns affiliate commission from some listed firms.